---
_id: '485'
author:
- first_name: Meinald T.
  full_name: Thielsch, Meinald T.
  last_name: Thielsch
- first_name: Ronja
  full_name: Engel, Ronja
  last_name: Engel
- first_name: Gerrit
  full_name: Hirschfeld, Gerrit
  id: '234690'
  last_name: Hirschfeld
  orcid: 0000-0003-2143-4564
  orcid_put_code_url: https://api.orcid.org/v2.0/0000-0003-2143-4564/work/176176448
citation:
  alphadin: '<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Thielsch, Meinald T.</span> ;
    <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Engel, Ronja</span> ; <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Hirschfeld,
    Gerrit</span>: Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability.
    In: <i>PeerJ Computer Science</i> Bd. 1 (2015), Nr. e19, S. 1–19'
  ama: Thielsch MT, Engel R, Hirschfeld G. Expected usability is not a valid indicator
    of experienced usability. <i>PeerJ Computer Science</i>. 2015;1(e19):1-19. doi:<a
    href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.19">10.7717/peerj-cs.19</a>
  apa: Thielsch, M. T., Engel, R., &#38; Hirschfeld, G. (2015). Expected usability
    is not a valid indicator of experienced usability. <i>PeerJ Computer Science</i>,
    <i>1</i>(e19), 1–19. <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.19">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.19</a>
  bibtex: '@article{Thielsch_Engel_Hirschfeld_2015, title={Expected usability is not
    a valid indicator of experienced usability}, volume={1}, DOI={<a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.19">10.7717/peerj-cs.19</a>},
    number={e19}, journal={PeerJ Computer Science}, author={Thielsch, Meinald T. and
    Engel, Ronja and Hirschfeld, Gerrit}, year={2015}, pages={1–19} }'
  chicago: 'Thielsch, Meinald T., Ronja Engel, and Gerrit Hirschfeld. “Expected Usability
    Is Not a Valid Indicator of Experienced Usability.” <i>PeerJ Computer Science</i>
    1, no. e19 (2015): 1–19. <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.19">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.19</a>.'
  ieee: M. T. Thielsch, R. Engel, and G. Hirschfeld, “Expected usability is not a
    valid indicator of experienced usability,” <i>PeerJ Computer Science</i>, vol.
    1, no. e19, pp. 1–19, 2015.
  mla: Thielsch, Meinald T., et al. “Expected Usability Is Not a Valid Indicator of
    Experienced Usability.” <i>PeerJ Computer Science</i>, vol. 1, no. e19, 2015,
    pp. 1–19, doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.19">10.7717/peerj-cs.19</a>.
  short: M.T. Thielsch, R. Engel, G. Hirschfeld, PeerJ Computer Science 1 (2015) 1–19.
date_created: 2019-05-28T12:24:28Z
date_updated: 2026-03-17T15:29:07Z
doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.19
intvolume: '         1'
issue: e19
keyword:
- Usability
- Aesthetics
- First impression
- Website evaluation
- Website
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
oa: '1'
page: 1-19
publication: PeerJ Computer Science
publication_identifier:
  issn:
  - 2376-5992
status: public
title: Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability
type: journal_article
user_id: '35437'
volume: 1
year: '2015'
...