@inproceedings{7039,
  author       = {Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Jagemann, Inga},
  booktitle    = {Design, User Experience, and Usability. 15th International Conference, DUXU 2026, Held as Part of the 28th HCI International Conference, HCII 2026, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 26–31, 2026, Proceedings, Part II},
  editor       = {Schrepp, Martin},
  isbn         = {978-3-032-30079-9},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Montreal, QC, Canada},
  pages        = {268--279},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature Switzerland},
  title        = {{Improving HCI-Research Using Behavioral Measures - A Tutorial in Choice Based Conjoint Analysis}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-032-30080-5_18},
  year         = {2026},
}

@article{6986,
  abstract     = {Background: Artificial intelligence–based skin cancer screening apps (AISCSAs) offer diagnostic potential but face limited adoption. App store cues, such as ratings, may influence acceptance; yet, little is known about how users cognitively process app store information in high-stakes health contexts. To address this gap, eye-tracking was used to measure visual attention while participants evaluated a mock AISCSA app store listing.

Objective: This study aimed to test whether a single negative rating captures visual attention and whether an extended technology acceptance model (TAM) can predict behavioral intention to use (BI) AISCSAs.

Methods: Participants (N=76) evaluated a mock app store listing for an AISCSA under positive (n=42) or negative (n=34) rating conditions while their eye movements were recorded. Analyses combined fixation durations in defined areas of interest (AOIs) with self-reported measures of perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), trust, BI, willingness to pay, and the self-rated importance of app attributes.

Results: Normalized fixation durations (seconds per square pixel) revealed the highest attention to the description (0.166 s/px2), followed by the reviews (0.11 s/px2) and the ratings (0.04 s/px2), while the price and the data protection received the least attention. Of the 5 self-rated app attributes, only reviews correlated positively with fixation durations on the reviews-AOI (r=0.28; P=.01). Rating valence had no significant effect on gaze patterns, PU, PEOU, trust, BI, or willingness to pay (all Ps>.05). However, PEOU (P=.001), PU (P<.001), and trust (P<.001) were significantly correlated with BI.

Conclusions: Although the expected attentional capture effect of the negative rating was not observed, the weak or nonexistent associations between fixation durations on the AOIs and the self-rated importance of app attributes suggest that eye-tracking captures aspects of information processing that are not directly reflected in self-reported evaluations. These findings indicate that eye-tracking provides a more direct approximation of actual user behavior by revealing implicit attentional processes beyond what is captured by questionnaires. While the technology acceptance model constructs and trust predicted BI, rating valence alone did not affect acceptance or gaze behavior. In high-stakes health contexts, textual information may outweigh rating valence in driving adoption. Future research should explore conditions under which rating valence matters, including more extreme rating contrasts, variations in accompanying review texts, and the influence of individual differences such as preexisting attitudes toward artificial intelligence and levels of artificial intelligence literacy.},
  author       = {Jagemann, Inga and Hegner, Sabrina and Hirschfeld, Gerrit},
  issn         = {2292-9495},
  journal      = {JMIR Human Factors},
  pages        = {e93489--e93489},
  publisher    = {JMIR Publications Inc.},
  title        = {{The Role of Rating Valence in AI Skin Cancer App Acceptance: Eye-Tracking and Questionnaire Study}},
  doi          = {10.2196/93489},
  volume       = {13},
  year         = {2026},
}

@article{6939,
  author       = {Schmidt, Amelie Florentine and Meyer, Dorothee and Rau, Lisa-Marie and Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Frosch, Michael and Frühwald, Michael C. and Ahnert, Rosemarie and Höfel, Lea and Storf, Magdalena and Blankenburg, Markus and Steinert, Kerstin and Schneider, Udo and Marschall, Ursula and Wager, Julia and Zernikow, Boris},
  issn         = {1423-0348},
  journal      = {Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics},
  pages        = {1--25},
  publisher    = {S. Karger AG},
  title        = {{Clinical effectiveness of different feedback intensities in a pain management app - A multicenter randomized controlled trial with youths with chronic pain and their caregivers}},
  doi          = {10.1159/000551681},
  year         = {2026},
}

@article{6940,
  abstract     = {Background: Functional abdominal pain (FAP) is a severely debilitating condition affecting approximately 11.7% of children and adolescents worldwide, often persisting into adulthood and significantly restricting daily life. Health literacy is essential for treatment success. To improve knowledge about the biopsychosocial factors influencing FAP and support its management, we developed an educational multimedia website (https://meine-bauchstelle.com).
Methods: In a multicenter randomised controlled trial (RCT), patients with FAP (N = 166, age 5–17 years, M = 10.8, SD = 3.31; 53.6% female) and their parents were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG: access to the website before the first measurement) or a control group (CG: no access to the website during data collection). The primary outcome was health literacy (knowledge and health behaviour) and secondary outcomes were abdominal pain symptoms and the physician-patient/parent interactions. Group differences were analysed using t-tests and multilevel models.
Results: Patients in the IG who visited the website demonstrated significantly higher initial knowledge scores compared to the CG. Moreover, they reported significantly less pain-related disability across three assessments over 3 months. Parents who visited the website rated the physician-parent interaction significantly more positively than those in the CG.
Conclusions: The educational website efficiently increased patient knowledge about FAP and improved certain pain-related behaviours. It serves as an effective tool in conveying information about FAP in clinical practice. Future applications could extend to preventive measures in schools and other settings.
Significance Statement: The educational website about functional abdominal pain is effective in transferring knowledge, reducing pain-related disability, and improving physician-parent interactions. It can support physicians in day-to-day clinical practice by referring patients to the website for further information and might be extended as a preventive measure in schools.},
  author       = {Neß, Verena and Humberg, Clarissa and Rau, Lisa‐Marie and Eidt, Leandra and Berger, Thomas and Claßen, Martin and Syring, Nils Christian and Berrang, Jens and Vietor, Christine and Buderus, Stephan and Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Becker‐Emden, Christina and Wager, Julia},
  issn         = {1532-2149},
  journal      = {European Journal of Pain},
  number       = {3},
  publisher    = {Wiley},
  title        = {{A Randomised Controlled Trial Testing the Efficacy of an Educational Website About Functional Abdominal Pain for Children and Adolescents}},
  doi          = {10.1002/ejp.70249},
  volume       = {30},
  year         = {2026},
}

@article{6938,
  abstract     = {                    Background - 
                    Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most widely established treatments for mental disorders in children and adolescents and is empirically supported across a wide range of disorders, including evidence from routine care. However, evidence on long-term maintenance of effects in routine outpatient care is still limited, particularly across diagnostic groups. This study examines the long-term, cross-diagnostic effectiveness of CBT in children and adolescents treated under routine outpatient care conditions.
                  <br />
                    Methods - 
                    Analyses are based on pre-existing routine outcome monitoring data from 1225 patients (mean age = 14.00 years, SD = 3.24) receiving CBT, collected between 2017 and 2025. Symptoms were assessed using the parent- and patient-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) at pre-treatment, post-treatment and at 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-ups. Additional self-rated treatment-success ratings were collected at follow-up (covering expectations fulfilled, perceived helpfulness, problem recurrence and perceived change). Effectiveness was described using group means as well as clinical significance. Pre- to post- and pre- to follow-up changes were analysed using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Associations between follow-up SDQ scores and self-rated treatment success were examined using partial Spearman correlations controlling for baseline SDQ.
                  <br />
                    Results - 
                    
                      Across both parent- and patient-reported SDQ assessments, total difficulties and problem subscales showed significant improvements from pre- to post-treatment and from pre-treatment to all follow-up time points. Effect sizes were consistently moderate-to-large
                      (
                      r_rb = 0.59–0.77), with sustained effects up to 24 months. Higher follow-up SDQ difficulties were associated with lower self-rated treatment success across multiple follow-up ratings, with strongest associations observed for problem recurrence and change compared to before treatment. Sensitivity analyses restricted to participants in the clinical range at baseline (SDQ ≥ 17) yielded consistent results.
                    
                  <br />
                    Conclusions - 
                    Routine outpatient CBT for children and adolescents was associated with meaningful symptom improvements that persisted up to two years after treatment. Clinically significant change analyses indicated that while many patients showed reliable improvement, a substantial proportion remained classified as unchanged according to conservative criteria. Subjective follow-up ratings were consistent with standardized symptom outcomes, supporting the perceived durability of treatment success under routine care conditions in a diagnostically heterogeneous sample.
                  },
  author       = {Hüwelmeier, Matthis Michael and Staniczek, Lena and Schneider, Silvia and Zhang, Xiao Chi and Wannemüller, André and Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Krause, Karen and Friedrich, Sören and von Brachel, Ruth},
  issn         = {2050-7283},
  journal      = {BMC Psychology},
  number       = {1},
  publisher    = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
  title        = {{Long-term effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for children and adolescents in routine care}},
  doi          = {10.1186/s40359-026-04667-3},
  volume       = {14},
  year         = {2026},
}

@article{5408,
  author       = {Linde, Mira von der and Göcke, Melanie and Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Thielsch, Meinald T.},
  issn         = {0925-7535},
  journal      = {Safety Science},
  publisher    = {Elsevier BV},
  title        = {{Check or reject? Trust and motivation development in app-based warning systems}},
  doi          = {10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106724},
  volume       = {185},
  year         = {2025},
}

@article{6366,
  author       = {Velten, Julia and Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Margraf, Jürgen},
  issn         = {1559-8519},
  journal      = {The Journal of Sex Research},
  pages        = {1--14},
  publisher    = {Informa UK Limited},
  title        = {{Mediators of Change in Cognitive Behavioral and Mindfulness-Based Online-Interventions for Hypoactive Sexual Desire Dysfunction in Women}},
  doi          = {10.1080/00224499.2025.2585522},
  year         = {2025},
}

@misc{6295,
  author       = {Beermann, Jana and Von Brachel, Ruth and Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Bonnin, Gabriel and Jagemann, Inga and Schneider, Silvia},
  publisher    = {PsychArchives},
  title        = {{Preregistration Protocoll: Pierced, tattooed, but manic?! - The influence of prototypicality on the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder}},
  doi          = {10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.16855},
  year         = {2025},
}

@misc{6183,
  author       = {Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Hegner, Sabrina and Schilling, Leoni and Durmaz, Elif},
  publisher    = {Hochschule Bielefeld},
  title        = {{Dataset for: You say your best when you say anything at all: Crisis Communication Strategies by Muslim Organizations in the Aftermath of Islamist Terrorism}},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.14882367},
  year         = {2025},
}

@misc{6188,
  author       = {Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Maier, Günter W. and Arlinghaus, Clarissa Sabrina and Jagemann, Inga},
  publisher    = {OSF},
  title        = {{Social Exclusion in Skin Cancer Screenings}},
  doi          = {10.17605/OSF.IO/FQKS8},
  year         = {2025},
}

@inbook{6200,
  author       = {Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Hegner, Sabrina},
  booktitle    = {Islamismus als gesellschaftliche Herausforderung. Ursachen, Wirkungen, Handlungsoptionen},
  editor       = {Abdellah, Shaimaa and Tultschinetski, Sina and Junk, Julian and Freiheit, Manuela},
  isbn         = {978-3-658-48201-5},
  issn         = {3005-0596},
  publisher    = {Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden},
  title        = {{Krisenkommunikation muslimischer Verbände nach Anschlägen mit islamistischem Hintergrund}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-658-48202-2},
  year         = {2025},
}

@inproceedings{6217,
  author       = {Thiele, Christian and Hirschfeld, Gerrit},
  booktitle    = {Good Evaluation - Better Digital Health. Proceedings of the EFMI Special Topic Conference 2025},
  editor       = {Hübner, Ursula H. and Liebe, Jan-David and Benis, Arriel and Egbert, Nicole and Engelsma, Thomas and Gallos, Parisis and Flemming, Daniel and Lichtner, Valentina and Marcilly, Romaric and Tamburis, Oscar and Villumsen, Sidsel},
  issn         = {18798365},
  pages        = {350--354},
  publisher    = {IOS Press},
  title        = {{Topics and Characteristics of Registered Studies on LLMs}},
  doi          = {10.3233/SHTI251560},
  year         = {2025},
}

@article{6240,
  author       = {Jagemann, Inga and Baudisch, Justin and Jungeblut, Thorsten and Maier, Günter W. and Hirschfeld, Gerrit},
  journal      = {PsychArchives},
  publisher    = {PsychArchives},
  title        = {{The More You Know, the Less You Want to Rely on It – Consumer preferences for AI-based health monitoring in smart home systems}},
  doi          = {10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.21275},
  year         = {2025},
}

@article{6040,
  author       = {Arlinghaus, Clarissa Sabrina and Jagemann, Inga and Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Maier, Günter W.},
  journal      = {Preprint},
  publisher    = {Center for Open Science},
  title        = {{No Appointment, No Mercy: How Rejection in Healthcare Affects Patients' Needs and Practice Reputation - Can AI Scheduling Soften the Blow or Make it Worse?}},
  doi          = {10.31219/osf.io/p8v34_v1},
  year         = {2025},
}

@article{5883,
  author       = {Hegner, Sabrina and Schilling, Leoni and Durmaz, Elif and Hirschfeld, Gerrit},
  issn         = {1099-0992},
  journal      = {European Journal of Social Psychology},
  publisher    = {Wiley},
  title        = {{You Say Your Best When You Say at All: Crisis Communication Strategies by Muslim Organizations in the Aftermath of Islamist Terrorism}},
  doi          = {10.1002/ejsp.3159},
  year         = {2025},
}

@article{5884,
  author       = {Thiele, Christian and von Brachel, Ruth and Hirschfeld, Gerrit},
  journal      = {Preprint},
  publisher    = {Center for Open Science},
  title        = {{(In-)Feasibility of Using Trial Registers Instead of Journal Articles for Meta-Analyses in Psychology}},
  year         = {2025},
}

@article{5770,
  author       = {Rau, Lisa-Marie and Dogan, Meltem and Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Blankenburg, Markus and Frühwald, Michael C. and Ahnert, Rosemarie and Braun, Sarah and Marschall, Ursula and Zernikow, Boris and Wager, Julia},
  issn         = {2471-2531},
  journal      = {PAIN Reports},
  number       = {1},
  publisher    = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
  title        = {{The effects of psychosocial aftercare following pediatric chronic pain treatment withstand the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial}},
  doi          = {10.1097/PR9.0000000000001226},
  volume       = {10},
  year         = {2025},
}

@article{5590,
  author       = {Jagemann, Inga and Thiele, Christian and von Brachel, Ruth and Hirschfeld, Gerrit},
  issn         = {1460-2245},
  journal      = {Health Promotion International},
  number       = {1},
  publisher    = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
  title        = {{Substituting confidence for competence in health literacy: a review of studies, citations, and trial registrations}},
  doi          = {10.1093/heapro/daae203},
  volume       = {40},
  year         = {2025},
}

@article{4520,
  author       = {Jeckel, Jacoba and Thiele, Christian and Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Teismann, Tobias and Schneider, Silvia and von Brachel, Ruth},
  issn         = {1099-0879},
  journal      = {Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy},
  number       = {2},
  publisher    = {Wiley},
  title        = {{Better Safe Than Sorry. A Scoping Review of Monitoring for Negative Effects in Preregistrations of Psychological Interventions}},
  doi          = {10.1002/cpp.2968},
  volume       = {31},
  year         = {2024},
}

@article{4329,
  author       = {Brailovskaia, Julia and von Brachel, Ruth and van Hall, Franziska and Teismann, Tobias and Hirschfeld, Gerrit and Margraf, Jürgen},
  issn         = {1664-0640},
  journal      = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
  publisher    = {Frontiers Media SA},
  title        = {{A dual-factor model perspective on depressed inpatients: examining the dynamics of mental health and therapy outcomes}},
  doi          = {10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1295032},
  volume       = {14},
  year         = {2024},
}