Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability
M.T. Thielsch, R. Engel, G. Hirschfeld, PeerJ Computer Science 1 (2015) 1–19.
Artikel
| Englisch
Autor*in
Thielsch, Meinald T.;
Engel, Ronja;
Hirschfeld, Gerrit
Stichworte
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
PeerJ Computer Science
Band
1
Zeitschriftennummer
e19
Seite
1-19
ISSN
FH-PUB-ID
Zitieren
Thielsch, Meinald T. ; Engel, Ronja ; Hirschfeld, Gerrit: Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability. In: PeerJ Computer Science Bd. 1 (2015), Nr. e19, S. 1–19
Thielsch MT, Engel R, Hirschfeld G. Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability. PeerJ Computer Science. 2015;1(e19):1-19. doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.19
Thielsch, M. T., Engel, R., & Hirschfeld, G. (2015). Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability. PeerJ Computer Science, 1(e19), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.19
@article{Thielsch_Engel_Hirschfeld_2015, title={Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability}, volume={1}, DOI={10.7717/peerj-cs.19}, number={e19}, journal={PeerJ Computer Science}, author={Thielsch, Meinald T. and Engel, Ronja and Hirschfeld, Gerrit}, year={2015}, pages={1–19} }
Thielsch, Meinald T., Ronja Engel, and Gerrit Hirschfeld. “Expected Usability Is Not a Valid Indicator of Experienced Usability.” PeerJ Computer Science 1, no. e19 (2015): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.19.
M. T. Thielsch, R. Engel, and G. Hirschfeld, “Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 1, no. e19, pp. 1–19, 2015.
Thielsch, Meinald T., et al. “Expected Usability Is Not a Valid Indicator of Experienced Usability.” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 1, no. e19, 2015, pp. 1–19, doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.19.
Closed Access
Google Scholar