A Comparison of Flexible BPMN and CMMN in Practice: A Case Study on Component Release Processes
A. Zensen, J. Küster, in: IEEE (Ed.), 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), IEEE, 2018, pp. 105–114.
Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Konferenzbeitrag
| Veröffentlicht
| Englisch
Autor*in
Zensen, André;
Küster, Jochen
herausgebende Körperschaft
IEEE
Erscheinungsjahr
Titel des Konferenzbandes
2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)
Seite
105-114
Konferenz
2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)
Konferenzort
Stockholm
Konferenzdatum
2018-10-16 – 2018-10-19
FH-PUB-ID
Zitieren
Zensen, André ; Küster, Jochen: A Comparison of Flexible BPMN and CMMN in Practice: A Case Study on Component Release Processes. In: IEEE (Hrsg.): 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC) : IEEE, 2018, S. 105–114
Zensen A, Küster J. A Comparison of Flexible BPMN and CMMN in Practice: A Case Study on Component Release Processes. In: IEEE, ed. 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC). IEEE; 2018:105-114. doi:10.1109/EDOC.2018.00023
Zensen, A., & Küster, J. (2018). A Comparison of Flexible BPMN and CMMN in Practice: A Case Study on Component Release Processes. In IEEE (Ed.), 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC) (pp. 105–114). Stockholm : IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2018.00023
@inproceedings{Zensen_Küster_2018, title={A Comparison of Flexible BPMN and CMMN in Practice: A Case Study on Component Release Processes}, DOI={10.1109/EDOC.2018.00023}, booktitle={2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)}, publisher={IEEE}, author={Zensen, André and Küster, Jochen}, editor={IEEEEditor}, year={2018}, pages={105–114} }
Zensen, André, and Jochen Küster. “A Comparison of Flexible BPMN and CMMN in Practice: A Case Study on Component Release Processes.” In 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), edited by IEEE, 105–14. IEEE, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2018.00023.
A. Zensen and J. Küster, “A Comparison of Flexible BPMN and CMMN in Practice: A Case Study on Component Release Processes,” in 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), Stockholm , 2018, pp. 105–114.
Zensen, André, and Jochen Küster. “A Comparison of Flexible BPMN and CMMN in Practice: A Case Study on Component Release Processes.” 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), edited by IEEE, IEEE, 2018, pp. 105–14, doi:10.1109/EDOC.2018.00023.
Google Scholar